Research Article
Neural Differentiation of Human Umbilical Cord Blood-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Hassan Rafieemehr 1, Maryam Kheirandish 2 * , Masoud Soleimani 3,4
1 Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Para-Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran
2
Department of Immunology, Blood Transfusion Research Center, High
Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Tehran, IR
Iran
3 Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran
4 Department of Stem Cell Biology, Stem Cell Technology Research Center, Tehran, IR Iran
*Corresponding
author: Maryam Kheirandish, Department of Immunology, Blood Transfusion
Research Center, High Institute for Research and Education in
Transfusion Medicine, Tehran, IR Iran. Tel: +98-218860150130, Fax:
+98-2188601555, Email: m. kheirandish@ibto.ir
Abstract
Background: Cell
therapy is a potential therapeutic approach for neurodegenerative
disorders. Human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells
(hUCB-MSCs) are an appropriate source of stem cells for use in various
cell-based therapies.
Objectives: In this study, we examined a real-time PCR approach for neural differentiation of hUCB-MSCs in vitro.
Materials and Methods: MSCs were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS in a humidified incubator equilibration at 5% CO2
and 37°C. For the neural differentiation of MSCs, the DMEM was removed
and replaced with pre-induction media (retinoic acid [RA], basic
fibroblast growth factor [bFGF], and epidermal growth factor [EGF]) and
basal medium for two days. They were then cultured in nerve growth
factor (NGF), 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), ascorbic acid (AA),
and basal medium for six days. We also monitored the expression of
markers for neural differentiation with real-time PCR.
Results: The
results of real-time PCR showed that the expression of the GFAP, MBP,
and MAP-2 genes after two-step induction was significantly increased
compared to the common induction protocol. In addition, our study showed
that RA should play the main role in the neural differentiation and
fate of MSCs compared to other neural inducers.
Conclusions: Taken
together, the combination of chemical and growth factors in the
two-step induction protocol may improve the efficiency of MSC
differentiation into neural progenitor cells, and may be a new method
for the easy and fast application of MSCs in regenerative medicine in
the future.
Keywords: Mesenchymal Stromal Cells; Neuron-Like Cells; Cell Differentiation
1. Background
The development of stem
cells for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases is currently the
subject of intensive research efforts. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs),
neural stem cells (NSCs), bone marrow (BM)-derived mesenchymal stem
cells (MSCs), and adipose-derived adult stem (ADAS) cells have been
shown to generate differentiated neural cells both in vitro and in vivo,
which can be used as substitute therapies for various neurodegenerative
diseases (1-5).
However, despite the differentiation capability of these cells, ethical
conflicts, legal restrictions, the invasive procedures required to
obtain them, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are major challenges
in their development for clinical applications that emphasize exploring
and evaluating different sources for use in various cell-based therapies
(1, 6). MSCs have been shown to be ideal candidates for regenerative medicine (7).
In the present study, human umbilical cord blood-derived
mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs) were selected due to advantages such
as lower immunogenic potential, lack of GVHD, higher capacity for
differentiation into neural cells, quick accessibility, and easier and
non-invasive collection after delivery compared to that of BM-MSCs (8).
Furthermore, hUCB-MSCs are more primitive than BM-MSCs and MSCs from
other sources. Moreover, in contrast to BM-MSCs, the differentiation
potential of hUCB-MSCs does not change during frequent passages (9).
In recent years, more attention has been paid to MSC-derived NPCs (MSC-NPCs) for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases (10-13).
To date, it has been reported that MSCs could induce neural
differentiation through many in vitro methods, such as chemical
inducers, growth factors, and co-cultures with neural cells (14-17).
However, due to differences in MSC isolation, MSC culture conditions,
MSC sources, and other factors, the results of the previous studies are
not compatible with each other.
2. Objectives
Based on previous reports
that showed transdifferentiation of MSCs, we designed a real-time PCR
approach for the neural differentiation of hUCB-MSCs in vitro.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Isolation of MSCs from Human UCB
The collection, isolation, and propagation of hUCB-MSCs was performed as described in the literature (18-20).
To summarize, the mononuclear cell (MNC) fraction was obtained by
Ficoll-Hypaque low-density gradient separation (mononuclear cells <
1.077 g/mL; Cedarlane, Hornby, Ontario, Canada), followed by ammonium
chloride lysis of red blood cells. After being washed twice in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco, USA), the collected MNCs were
re-suspended in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM;
Gibco), and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco),
L-glutamine (Gibco), 100 U/mL of penicillin, and 100 mg/mL of
streptomycin (Gibco). MSCs were cultured in 25 cm2 tissue-culture flasks (Nunc, USA) in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air with 5% CO2 at 37°C.
3.2. Flow Cytometry Analysis
After the third passage, the cells were trypsinized with 0.05%
trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), washed twice with PBS,
then stained on ice with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated mouse anti-human
CD44, CD45, and CD105 antibodies, and fluorescein isothiocyanate
(FITC)-conjugated mouse anti-human CD34 antibodies (BD Biosciences,
USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were then
incubated in the dark for 30 minutes at 4°C. To remove the unlabeled
antibodies, the cells were washed with PBS containing 2% FBS (stain
buffer) with centrifugation at 1300 rpm for 5 minutes. In the control
group, PE-IgG1 and FITC-IgG1 were used. The stained cells (10,000 events
counted) were analyzed with flow cytometry (Partec Flomax, ver 2.4e).
3.3. Neural Differentiation
The differentiation potential of the cells was examined on the
fourth passage of the hUCB-MSCs. For the induction of neurogenic
differentiation, 20,000 cells per well (on a 24-well plate) were
cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS in a humidified incubator
equilibration with 5% CO2 at 37°C. For the neural differentiation of
MSCs, first the DMEM was removed and replaced with pre-induction media
containing basal medium, then supplemented with L-glutamine, 5 µM of
retinoic acid (RA, Sigma), 10 ng/mL of basic fibroblast growth factor
(bFGF, Sigma), and 10 ng/ml of epidermal growth factor (EGF, Sigma) for
two days. After 48 hours, induction was improved by adding 10 ng/mL of
nerve growth factor (NGF, R&D Systems, USA), 0.5 mM of
3-isobutylmethyl-xanthine (IBMX, Sigma),100 µM of ascorbic acid (AA,
Sigma), and basal medium for six days.
3.4. RT-PCR and Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis
In brief, total RNA was isolated from undifferentiated and
differentiating hUCB-MSCs using an RNA isolation kit (Qiagen, USA).
Synthesis of cDNA was carried out with the Moloney murine leukemia virus
(M-MuLV) reverse transcriptase (RT) and a random hexamer as primer
according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen), in order to
confirm the expression of neural-specific genes by RT-PCR. PCR
amplification was conducted using a standard procedure with Taq DNA
polymerase, with denaturation at 94°C for 15 seconds, annealing at 55°C
or 60°C for 30 seconds based on the primer, and extension at 72°C for 45
seconds. The PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis on 2%
agarose gel in 1 × tris-acetate-EDTA buffer and visualized with SYBR
Safe staining, and then images were captured using the Bio-Rad Gel
documentation system. The experiments were generally conducted in
triplicate. The nucleotide sequences and the amplicon sizes of the
designed primers are listed in Table 1.
In order to confirm and evaluate the expression levels of
neural-specific genes by quantitative real-time PCR, the cDNAs were used
for a 40-cycle PCR in a Corbett Rotor-Gene 6000 Analyzer (Corbett,
Germany). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed in triplicate by SYBR
Green Real-Time Master Mix (Takara, Japan) in the Rotor-Gene 6000
system, followed by a melting curve analysis to confirm PCR specificity.
The cycle threshold (Ct) was calculated automatically and normalization
was carried out against the β-actin Ct value. Relative expression was
quantified using REST 2009 software (V2.0.13).
|
Table 1.
Amplification Cycles, Sequences, and Amplicon Size of the Specific Primers Designed for Assessing Expression of Neural Markers
|
3.5. Statistical Analysis
Two-sided paired t-test for related samples and Friedman’s
two-way analysis of variance by rank were used to analyze the flow
cytometry. All data were analyzed using SPSS software.
4. Results
4.1. Fibroblastic Morphology and Surface Markers of hUCB-MSCs
A fibroblast-like phenotype was obtained from cord blood after three passages in vitro (Figure 1).
The flow cytometry analysis of cell-surface markers in the MSCs (10,000
events) showed the expression of CD105 (84.85 ± 9.40, n = 3) and CD44
(94.45 ± 4.9, n = 3) (P < 0.05), but not of CD34 (1.80 ± 0.35, n = 3)
or CD45 (2.5 ± 1.40, n = 3) (P < 0.05). The surface-marker patterns
corresponded to UCB-MSCs. As was evidenced by flow cytometry, the
isolated cells were positive for CD105 and CD44, but negative for CD34
and CD45 (Figure 1).
|
Figure 1.
Flow Cytometry
Analysis of Cell-Surface Markers in MSCs Showed Expression of CD105
(84.85 ± 9.40, n = 3) (P < 0.05) but not of CD34 (1.80 ± 0.35, n = 3)
(P < 0.05)
|
4.2. Differentiation Studies of MSCs
Neural morphologies (a sign of neural differentiation) were
observed on the second day, when some cells were stretched in one and/or
two directions. The control samples showed no changes in shape. The
MSCs were differentiated into MSC-NPCs, with this characteristic being
identified through morphology, RT-PCR, and quantitative real-time PCR
assays (Figure 2).
|
Figure 2.
Neurogenic differentiation Capacity of UCB-MSCs and Morphological Appearance of Neural-Differentiated UCB-MSCs
|
4.3. Neural-Specific Gene Studies
Neural-specific gene expression levels with real-time PCR showed
that Map2 was upregulated in the sample group compared to the control
group (P = 0.000). GFAP was also upregulated in the sample group
compared to the control group (P = 0.000). The nestin sample group was
not different from the control group (P = 0.680), while MBP was
upregulated in the sample group compared to the control group (P =
0.000).
The report produced by REST 2009 indicated that the neural
markers in the differentiated cells were upregulated. In this study, the
maximum level of gene expression was related to GFAP and the lowest
level was related to nestin (Figure 2).
|
Figure 3.
Neural-Specific Gene Expression Levels With Real-Time PCR
|
5. Discussion
Despite the advantages of ESCs, they are not practical for neurodegenerative diseases due to several problems (6, 21). Recently, MSCs have been the focus of intensive investigations because of their relative advantages (22-24).
The generation of MSC-NPCs from hUCB-MSCs can be used for basic
research in order to develop effective cells for regenerative therapy (11). In addition, recent reports have documented that MSCs can differentiate into MSC-NPCs (16, 17).
These studies generated MSC-NPCs under culture conditions. In the
present study, consistent with previous reports, the expression pattern (Figure 1)
on flow cytometry over 10,000 events showed that CD105 and CD44 markers
were positive, while CD45 and CD34 markers were negative (25, 26).
There are different methods of inducing MSC-NPCs. Tio and Wang used the same culture protocol, with some differences (27, 28). Woodbury used a culture protocol by adding in the first week of culture followed a simple medium with serum (16).
The present study was conducted with a two-step induction protocol. The
first step was pre-induction with basal medium, RA, bFGF, and EGF; the
second step was induction with NGF, IBMX, AA, and basal medium. The
time-duration for the emergence of MSC-NPCs and various types of neural
markers depends on the culture system used. Tio and Wang’s method showed
the longest duration for which no basal medium was provided (27, 28).
In contrast, we found that if B-ME was used immediately from the start,
MSC-NPCs failed to form. In agreement with previous studies, in the
present study, using the most common growth factors, as well as the
selection of basal medium instead of FBS, was found to be an efficient
method for inducing cells to be selected.
In our protocol, a significant increase occurred in GFAP, MAP2,
and MBP expression, especially GFAP. Undifferentiated hUCB-MSC cells
did not express neuron-specific genes and did not stain positively for
neuro-specific proteins on quantitative real-time PCR and ICC,
respectively.
Previous studies showed that RA combined with other factors,
such as NGF, β-ME, BDNF, Forskolin, and IBMX, is necessary for the
neural differentiation of MSCs in vitro (29-31).
In the present study, it was found that after the combined treatment
with a low concentration of RA, more than 30% of hUCB-MSCs were
differentiated into GFAP-expressing cells. RA should be a main factor in
the neural differentiation of MSCs compared to other inducers.
In brief, the importance of our simple method will be clear
when it is compared with other methods that are complex and
time-consuming. MSC-NPCs share many molecular and cellular
characteristics with neural stem cells, and on a cellular level they
have the same morphology, with the formation of a spheroid body
structure that is stretched in one and/or two directions after in vitro
culturing. In contrast to MSCs, the use of MSC-NPCs for cell
transplantation results in more effective cell-based therapies; in
addition, the tumor-formation problem is avoided. These characteristics
suggest therapeutic uses for MSC-NPCs as a new and unlimited source in
regenerative medicine. Finally, further and complementary studies are
required that include identification of neural proteins with western
blot. The functionality of MSC-NPCs must be carefully assessed in animal
experiments before being used in clinical applications.
Acknowledgments
The results described in this paper were part of a
student thesis. We sincerely thank Dr. Amir Atashi for his cooperation
with the cell differentiation.
Footnotes
References
-
1.
Aharonowiz M, Einstein O, Fainstein N, Lassmann H, Reubinoff B, Ben-Hur
T. Neuroprotective effect of transplanted human embryonic stem
cell-derived neural precursors in an animal model of multiple sclerosis.
PLoS One. 2008;3(9):e3145 [DOI] [PubMed]
-
2.
Ben-Hur T, Idelson M, Khaner H, Pera M, Reinhartz E, Itzik A, et al.
Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitors
improves behavioral deficit in Parkinsonian rats. Stem Cells. 2004;22(7):1246-55. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
3.
Einstein O, Grigoriadis N, Mizrachi-Kol R, Reinhartz E, Polyzoidou E,
Lavon I, et al. Transplanted neural precursor cells reduce brain
inflammation to attenuate chronic experimental autoimmune
encephalomyelitis. Exp Neurol. 2006;198(2):275-84. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
4.
Hellmann MA, Panet H, Barhum Y, Melamed E, Offen D. Increased survival
and migration of engrafted mesenchymal bone marrow stem cells in
6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rodents. Neurosci Lett. 2006;395(2):124-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
5.
Ahmadian-Attari MM, Ahmadiani A, Kamalinejad M, Dargahi L, Shirzad M,
Mosaddegh M. Treatment of Alzheimer's disease in Iranian traditional
medicine. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(1):e18052 [DOI] [PubMed]
-
6.
Knoepfler PS. Deconstructing stem cell tumorigenicity: a roadmap to safe
regenerative medicine. Stem Cells. 2009;27(5):1050-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
7.
Chen
FH, Tuan RS. Mesenchymal stem cells in arthritic diseases. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(5):223. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
8.
Jung
KH, Shin HP, Lee S, Lim YJ, Hwang SH, Han H, et al. Effect of human
umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a cirrhotic rat
model. Liver Int. 2009;29(6):898-909. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
9.
Park
DH, Lee JH, Borlongan CV, Sanberg PR, Chung YG, Cho TH. Transplantation
of umbilical cord blood stem cells for treating spinal cord injury. Stem Cell Rev. 2011;7(1):181-94. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
10.
Cao
W, Yang Y, Wang Z, Liu A, Fang L, Wu F, et al. Leukemia inhibitory
factor inhibits T helper 17 cell differentiation and confers treatment
effects of neural progenitor cell therapy in autoimmune disease. Immunity. 2011;35(2):273-84. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
11.
Harris VK, Yan QJ, Vyshkina T, Sahabi S, Liu X, Sadiq SA. Clinical and
pathological effects of intrathecal injection of mesenchymal stem
cell-derived neural progenitors in an experimental model of multiple
sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2012;313(1-2):167-77. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
12.
Liu
S, Li C, Xing Y, Tao F. Effect of transplantation of human embryonic
stem cell-derived neural progenitor cells on adult neurogenesis in aged
hippocampus. Am J Stem Cells. 2014;3(1):21-6. [PubMed]
-
13.
Yang
J, Yan Y, Ma CG, Kang T, Zhang N, Gran B, et al. Accelerated and
enhanced effect of CCR5-transduced bone marrow neural stem cells on
autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;124(4):491-503. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
14.
Jiang Y, Henderson D, Blackstad M, Chen A, Miller RF, Verfaillie CM.
Neuroectodermal differentiation from mouse multipotent adult progenitor
cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100 Suppl 1:11854-60. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
15.
Sanchez-Ramos J, Song S, Cardozo-Pelaez F, Hazzi C, Stedeford T, Willing
A, et al. Adult bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neural
cells in vitro. Exp Neurol. 2000;164(2):247-56. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
16.
Wislet-Gendebien S, Hans G, Leprince P, Rigo JM, Moonen G, Rogister B.
Plasticity of cultured mesenchymal stem cells: switch from
nestin-positive to excitable neuron-like phenotype. Stem Cells. 2005;23(3):392-402. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
17.
Woodbury D, Schwarz EJ, Prockop DJ, Black IB. Adult rat and human bone
marrow stromal cells differentiate into neurons. J Neurosci Res. 2000;61(4):364-70. [PubMed]
-
18.
Greschat S, Schira J, Kury P, Rosenbaum C, de Souza Silva MA, Kogler G,
et al. Unrestricted somatic stem cells from human umbilical cord blood
can be differentiated into neurons with a dopaminergic phenotype. Stem Cells Dev. 2008;17(2):221-32. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
19.
Kogler G, Sensken S, Airey JA, Trapp T, Muschen M, Feldhahn N, et al. A
new human somatic stem cell from placental cord blood with intrinsic
pluripotent differentiation potential. J Exp Med. 2004;200(2):123-35. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
20.
Lim
JY, Park SI, Oh JH, Kim SM, Jeong CH, Jun JA, et al. Brain-derived
neurotrophic factor stimulates the neural differentiation of human
umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells and survival of
differentiated cells through MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt-dependent signaling
pathways. J Neurosci Res. 2008;86(10):2168-78. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
21.
Piao
J, Major T, Auyeung G, Policarpio E, Menon J, Droms L, et al. Human
embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitors remyelinate the
brain and rescue behavioral deficits following radiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16(2):198-210. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
22.
Kuroda Y. Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Umbilical Cord as Sources for
Schwann Cell Differentiation: their Potential in Peripheral Nerve
Repair. Open Tissue Engin Regenerat Med J. 2011;4(1):54-63. [DOI]
-
23.
Zhang J, Chen GH, Wang YW, Zhao J, Duan HF, Liao LM, et al. Hydrogen
peroxide preconditioning enhances the therapeutic efficacy of Wharton's
Jelly mesenchymal stem cells after myocardial infarction. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012;125(19):3472-8. [PubMed]
-
24.
Zhang YQ, He LM, Xing B, Zeng X, Zeng CG, Zhang W, et al. Neurotrophin-3
gene-modified Schwann cells promote TrkC gene-modified mesenchymal stem
cells to differentiate into neuron-like cells in
poly(lactic-acid-co-glycolic acid) multiple-channel conduit. Cells Tissues Organs. 2012;195(4):313-22. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
25.
Rebelatto CK, Aguiar AM, Moretao MP, Senegaglia AC, Hansen P, Barchiki
F, et al. Dissimilar differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from bone
marrow, umbilical cord blood, and adipose tissue. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2008;233(7):901-13. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
26.
Martins AA, Paiva A, Morgado JM, Gomes A, Pais ML. Quantification and
immunophenotypic characterization of bone marrow and umbilical cord
blood mesenchymal stem cells by multicolor flow cytometry. Transplant Proc. 2009;41(3):943-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
27.
Tio
M, Tan KH, Lee W, Wang TT, Udolph G. Roles of db-cAMP, IBMX and RA in
aspects of neural differentiation of cord blood derived mesenchymal-like
stem cells. PLoS One. 2010;5(2):e9398 [DOI] [PubMed]
-
28.
Wang
TT, Tio M, Lee W, Beerheide W, Udolph G. Neural differentiation of
mesenchymal-like stem cells from cord blood is mediated by PKA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;357(4):1021-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
29.
Kondo T, Matsuoka AJ, Shimomura A, Koehler KR, Chan RJ, Miller JM, et
al. Wnt signaling promotes neuronal differentiation from mesenchymal
stem cells through activation of Tlx3. Stem Cells. 2011;29(5):836-46. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
30.
Taran R, Mamidi MK, Singh G, Dutta S, Parhar IS, John JP, et al. In
vitro and in vivo neurogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cells
isolated from different sources. J Biosci. 2014;39(1):157-69. [PubMed]
-
31.
Deng
W, Obrocka M, Fischer I, Prockop DJ. In vitro differentiation of human
marrow stromal cells into early progenitors of neural cells by
conditions that increase intracellular cyclic AMP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;282(1):148-52. [DOI] [PubMed]