Research Article
The in
Silico Approach to Identify a Unique Plant-Derived Inhibitor Against E6
and E7 Oncogenic Proteins of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus 16 and 18
Satish Kumar 1 * , Lingaraja Jena 1, Maheswata Sahoo 1, Tapaswini Nayak 1, Kanchan Mohod 1, Sangeeta Daf 2, Ashok K. Varma 3
1
Bioinformatics and Biochemistry Centre, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of
Medical Sciences, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences,
Maharashtra, India
2 Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Deemed University, Maharashtra, India
3 Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, University of Mumbai, Navi Mumbai, India
*Corresponding
author: Satish Kumar, Bioinformatics and Biochemistry Centre, Mahatma
Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Maharashtra University of Health
Sciences, Maharashtra, India. Tel: +91-7152284679, Fax: +91-7152284038,
Email: satishangral@gmail.com
Abstract
Background: Globally,
the human papillomavirus (HPV) remains the foremost cause of cancer
mortality among women. There is a need to identify natural
anti-cancerous compounds that can fight against life-threatening
infections by HPV. Various kinds of natural plant-originated compounds
have been used in the traditional system of medicine for cancer therapy.
Different studies have reported the effective inhibition of HPV
infection enacted by certain natural compounds. Out of all the different
HPV types, HPV-16 and 18 are the ones mainly associated with causing
cervical cancer; furthermore, the E6 and E7 oncoproteins of these two
high-risk HPV types typically interact with tumor protein 53 (p53) and
retinoblastoma tumor suppressor proteins (pRb) of human host which
consequent to cancer formation.
Objectives: The
goal of this study is to identify unique plant-originated compounds to
utilize in order to combat the high-risk human papillomavirus
oncoproteins using docking measures.
Materials and Methods: Twelve
natural compounds jaceosidin, withaferin A, curcumin,
epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), artemisinin, gingerol, ursolic acid,
ferulic acid, berberin, silymarin, resveratrol, and indol-3-carbinol
were docked against E6 and E7 oncoproteins of high-risk HPV types 16 and
18 using a protein-ligand docking software called AutoDock4.2.
Results: Out of these 12 natural compounds, withaferin A was found to inhibit all four oncoproteins with minimum binding energy.
Conclusions: These
in silico findings indicate that withaferin A may be used as a common
drug for cervical cancer caused by high-risk HPV types, perhaps by
restoring the normal functions of tumor suppressor proteins.
Keywords: Human Papillomavirus; Oncogene Proteins; Molecular Docking; Plant Components
1. Background
An estimated 15% - 20% of all human cancers worldwide are caused by viral infections (1); the human papillomavirus (HPV) accounts for 5.2% of all cancers (2, 3).
Global cancer fatality in women is mostly due to cervical cancer, with
an estimated 0.527 million new cases and a 0.265 million annual
mortality rate (4). HPV-16 and 18 are responsible for 62.6% - 15.7% of cervical cancer cases (5);
they are also associated with oropharyngeal cancers (89% - 95%), anal
cancer (93%), vulva/vaginal cancers (80% - 86%), and penile cancer (63% -
80%), among others (6).
Consequently, these two HPV types 16 and 18 are the most recent targets
of anti-cancer drug designing efforts. Out of the eight types of
proteins expressed in HPV, E6 and E7 proteins are reported as
cooperative viral oncoproteins due to their expression in all HPV types (7).
These two proteins have been well known to interact with tumor
suppressor proteins p53 and pRb of human host that leads abrogate to
cervical cancer (8).
Although for over thirty years, HPV has been known to be a
causative agent for cervical cancer, a successful method of treatment
against HPV infection still has yet to be established (9).
In recent years, however, many natural plant origin compounds have been
identified as promising sources of drugs for therapeutic and
prophylactic uses in cancer (10, 11).
In our previous study, we already described the positive
results of using curcumin, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), jaceosidin
(12-14), resveratrol (13, 14), indole-3-carbinol, withaferin A (12, 14), artemisinin, ursolic acid, ferulic acid, berberin, resveratrol, gingerol, and silymarin (14) as indications that these compounds are possible effective sources of cancer treatment.
2. Objectives
The current study
purposes to examine the binding interaction of each of the
above-mentioned plant-originated ligands with the oncoproteins (E6 and
E7) of high-risk HPV (type 16 and 18), comparing the effectiveness of
each ligand with that of the others, in order to discover an appropriate
natural compound that can be further explored as a common drug against
high-risk types of HPV.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Hardware and Software
The protein-ligand docking software AutoDock 4.2 (15) installed in Dell Workstation with 6 GB RAM, 500 GB storage capacity, and 2.26 GHz processor was employed in this study.
3.2. Structure of HPV Oncoproteins
Predicted structures of the HPV oncoproteins E6 and E7 from the
human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 retrieved from the in-house
developed human papillomavirus proteome database (hpvPDB) (16) were selected as drug targets.
3.3. Ligand Preparation and Protein-Ligand Docking
The chemical structures of 12 natural compounds (artemisinin, WA,
ursolic acid, ferulic acid, EGCG, berberin, resveratrol, jaceosidin,
curcumin, gingerol, silymarin, and indol-3-carbino) were obtained from
the PubChem compound database (17).
Receptor molecules (HPV oncoproteins) were prepared in the AutoDock 4.2 program (15), and protein-ligand docking was performed as per the standard methodology used by Kumar et al. (12).
For preparing each receptor molecule, all hydrogen atoms were added to
the carbon atoms of the receptor, and Kollman charges were also assigned
using AutoDock Tools 1.5.4 (ADT). Non-polar hydrogens were also added
for docked ligands. Gasteiger charges were assigned and torsions degrees
of freedom were allocated by ADT. The Lamarckian genetic algorithm
(LGA) was applied to model the interaction pattern between the receptor
protein and selected inhibitors.
The grid maps representing the receptor proteins in the
docking process were calculated using AutoGrid (part of the AutoDock
package). A grid of 50, 50, and 50 points in the x, y, and z directions
was centered on the p53 and pRb binding sites of E6 and E7 proteins. For
all docking procedures, ten independent genetic algorithms running with
a population size of 150 were considered for each molecule under study.
A maximum number of 25 × 105 energy evaluations, 27,000
maximum generations, a gene mutation rate of 0.02, and a crossover rate
of 0.8 were used for the LGA. AutoDock was run in order to prepare
corresponding Docking LoG (DLG) files for further analysis (12).
3.4. Visualization
For visualizing the structure files, AutoDock Tools was used.
4. Results
From our docking
analysis, it was observed that all 12 natural ligands bind with HPV
oncoproteins that might help the restoration of normal functioning of
tumor suppressor proteins, and the lowest binding energy conformation
was analyzed and tabulated (Table 1). The active site of the model was analyzed based on the docking interaction between the p53 and pRb binding site residues (12-14, 18-20) of HPV oncoproteins, and all natural ligands.
|
Table 1.
Docking Analysis Results of HPV Oncoproteins and Natural Ligands
|
Out of the 12 natural ligands, withaferin A (WA) was the one
found to effectively interact with all four oncoproteins of HPV using
the lowest level of binding energy. WA was also observed to bind with
the HPV-16 E6 protein using the lowest level of binding energy (-7.58
kcal/mol), and the inhibition constant was found to be 2.77 μM. The
three amino acid residues of HPV-16 E6, Ala53, Leu117, and Lys122 were
observed to form hydrogen bonds with WA during protein-ligand
interactions (Figure 1A).
Furthermore, the binding energy of WA with HPV-16 E7 was observed to be
a minimum of -7.56 kcal/mol with an inhibition constant of 2.88 μM. WA
formed three hydrogen bonds with three amino acid residues (i.e. Arg66,
Asn53, and Glu80 from the HPV-16 E7 protein) (Figure 1B).
In the case of the HPV-18 E6 protein, WA interacted with four amino
acid residues from the receptor (Glu116, Asn113, Asn122, and Ser140) by
forming hydrogen bonds (Figure 1C); the binding energy of the interaction was -5.85 kcal/mol, and the inhibition constant was 51.35 μM.
|
Figure 1.
Interaction Profile of Withaferin A
|
Similarly, WA was observed to inhibit the HPV-18 E7 protein
with a binding energy of -5.77 and an inhibition constant of 58.77 μM by
forming only one hydrogen bond with Glu73 (Figure 1D).
5. Discussion
Few recent studies have
observed the inhibitory effects of different natural compounds on HPV
oncoproteins. Through their research, Kramer and Wesierska-Gadek (2009)
revealed the antiproliferative action of resveratrol by observing its
long-term effects on the cell cycle progression of human HeLa cervical
carcinoma cells (21).
Lee et al. (2005) isolated jaceosidin from the methanol (MeOH) extract
of Artemisia argyi and reported its inhibitory effects on the function
of the E6 and E7 oncoproteins of HPV-16 (22).
Mamgain et al. (2015) also observed the inhibitory effect of natural
compounds such as curcumin, colchine, ellipticine, daphnoretin, and
epigallocatechin-3-gallate, etc. on the HPV-16 E6 protein, using
molecular docking (23).
Our docking study also observed the interaction of all 12 natural
ligands with HPV oncoproteins and amongst them, Withaferin A was found
to effectively inhibit all four oncoproteins of HPV with minimum binding
energy.
He active compound of WA (also known as Withania somnifera or
“Ashwagandha”) has been reported to engage in anti-cancer,
radiosensitizing, and antiangiogenic activity (24, 25) against various cancer cells (26).
WA has also been reported to inhibit the nuclear
factor-κB-dependent, pro-inflammatory, and stress response pathways in
the astrocytes and the activation of astrocytic TLR4 by bacterial
lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge can promote nuclear factor κB
(NF-κB)-dependent induction of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) besides
cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (27). Lee et al. (2013) also reported WA as an effective approach for controlling metastasis and the invasiveness of tumors (28).
Munagala et al. (2011) confirmed the successful inhibition of cervical
cancer cells proliferation by WA through in vitro and in vivo study. In
addition, they showed the down-regulation of HPV E6 and the restoration
of the p53 pathway using WA (29).
This study also resulted in observations of WA as an effective
inhibitor of HPV oncoproteins. This computational approach demonstrates
the effectiveness of WA as an anticancer agent that needs to be explored
further in order to learn more about how to use natural resources for
designing novel drugs against cervical cancer.
Traditionally, different plant-originated compounds have been
identified and tested as promising resources against cancer caused by
HPV. Due to the recent advancement of bioinformatics and computational
biology, it is now possible to validate those natural compounds as
possible anticancer agents and identify additional common natural
compounds that can fight against the proteins of different HPV types.
For example, the high-risk HPV types 16 and 18 have HPV oncoproteins (E6
and E7) that need to be eliminated for various reasons, including the
fact that they are capable of inactivating tumor suppressor proteins p53
and pRb by inducing their degradation. This in silico study revealed
the effective inhibition of all four HPV oncoproteins by WA, which needs
further in vitro and in vivo validation before it can be considered for
becoming a common natural drug used for fighting cervical cancer.
Acknowledgments
The authors express gratitude to the Department of
biotechnology, ministry of science and technology, and the government of
India for their financial support of the bioinformatics centre, the
main site of this study. We also would like to thank Shri D.S. Mehta,
the president of the Kasturba health society; Dr. B.S. Garg, the
secretary of the Kasturba health society; Dr. K.R. Patond, the dean of
Mahatma Gandhi institute of medical sciences (MGIMS); Dr. S.P. Kalantri,
the medical superintendent at the Kasturba hospital of MGIMS; Sevagram
and Dr. B.C. Harinath, the director and the coordinator of Jamnalal
Bajaj tropical disease research centre JBTDRC at the bioinformatics
centre, for all their encouragement to us throughout this entire
research project.
Footnotes
References
-
1.
McLaughlin-Drubin ME, Munger K. Viruses associated with human cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1782(3):127-50. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
2.
Hausen HZ. Papillomavirus infections — a major cause of human cancers. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1996;1288(2):F55-78. [DOI]
-
3.
de
Martel C, Ferlay J, Franceschi S, Vignat J, Bray F, Forman D, et al.
Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: a review
and synthetic analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(6):607-15. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
4.
Bruni L, Barrionuevo-Rosas L, Albero G, Aldea M, Serrano B, Valencia S. ICO
Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Human
Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in the World. Summary Report.
Barcelona: ICO Information Centre on HPV and Cancer; 2014;
Available from: http://www.hpvcentre.net/stati...
-
5.
Guan
P, Howell-Jones R, Li N, Bruni L, de Sanjose S, Franceschi S, et al.
Human papillomavirus types in 115,789 HPV-positive women: a
meta-analysis from cervical infection to cancer. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(10):2349-59. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
6.
Chaturvedi AK. Beyond cervical cancer: burden of other HPV-related
cancers among men and women. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46(4 Suppl):S20-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
7.
Munger K, Baldwin A, Edwards KM, Hayakawa H, Nguyen CL, Owens M, et al.
Mechanisms of human papillomavirus-induced oncogenesis. J Virol. 2004;78(21):11451-60. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
8.
Scheffner M, Munger K, Byrne JC, Howley PM. The state of the p53 and
retinoblastoma genes in human cervical carcinoma cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(13):5523-7. [PubMed]
-
9.
Bharti AC, Shukla S, Mahata S, Hedau S, Das BC. Anti-human
papillomavirus therapeutics: facts & future. Indian J Med Res. 2009;130(3):296-310. [PubMed]
-
10.
Gordaliza M. Natural products as leads to anticancer drugs. Clin Transl Oncol. 2007;9(12):767-76. [PubMed]
-
11.
Sagar SM, Yance D, Wong RK. Natural health products that inhibit
angiogenesis: a potential source for investigational new agents to treat
cancer-Part 1. Curr Oncol. 2006;13(1):14-26. [PubMed]
-
12.
Kumar S, Jena L, Galande S, Daf S, Mohod K, Varma AK. Elucidating
Molecular Interactions of Natural Inhibitors with HPV-16 E6 Oncoprotein
through Docking Analysis. Genomics Inform. 2014;12(2):64-70. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
13.
Kumar S, Jena L, Galande S, Daf S, Varma AK. Molecular docking explains
atomic interaction between Plant-originated Ligands and Oncogenic E7
Protein of High Risk Human Papillomavirus Type 16. Int J Bioautomat. 2014;18(4):315-24.
-
14.
Kumar S, Jena L, Sahoo M, Kakde M, Daf S, Varma AK. In Silico Docking to
Explicate Interface between Plant-Originated Inhibitors and E6
Oncogenic Protein of Highly Threatening Human Papillomavirus 18. Genomics Inform. 2015;13(2):60-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
15.
Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, et al.
AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor
flexibility. J Comput Chem. 2009;30(16):2785-91. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
16.
Kumar S, Jena L, Daf S, Mohod K, Goyal P, Varma AK. hpvPDB: An Online
Proteome Reserve for Human Papillomavirus. Genomics Inform. 2013;11(4):289-91. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
17.
Wang
Y, Xiao J, Suzek TO, Zhang J, Wang J, Bryant SH. PubChem: a public
information system for analyzing bioactivities of small molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W623-33. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
18.
Crook T, Tidy JA, Vousden KH. Degradation of p53 can be targeted by HPV
E6 sequences distinct from those required for p53 binding and
trans-activation. Cell. 1991;67(3):547-56. [PubMed]
-
19.
Todorovic B, Hung K, Massimi P, Avvakumov N, Dick FA, Shaw GS, et al.
Conserved region 3 of human papillomavirus 16 E7 contributes to
deregulation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor. J Virol. 2012;86(24):13313-23. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
20.
Kumar S, Jena L, Mohod K, Daf S, Varma AK. Virtual Screening for
Potential Inhibitors of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus 16 E6 Protein. Interdiscip Sci. 2015;7(2):136-42. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
21.
Kramer MP, Wesierska-Gadek J. Monitoring of long-term effects of
resveratrol on cell cycle progression of human HeLa cells after
administration of a single dose. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1171:257-63. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
22.
Lee
HG, Yu KA, Oh WK, Baeg TW, Oh HC, Ahn JS, et al. Inhibitory effect of
jaceosidin isolated from Artemisiaargyi on the function of E6 and E7
oncoproteins of HPV 16. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;98(3):339-43. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
23.
Mamgain S, Sharma P, Pathak RK, Baunthiyal M. Computer aided screening
of natural compounds targeting the E6 protein of HPV using molecular
docking. Bioinformation. 2015;11(5):236-42. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
24.
Sharada AC, Solomon FE, Devi PU, Udupa N, Srinivasan KK. Antitumor and
radiosensitizing effects of withaferin A on mouse Ehrlich ascites
carcinoma in vivo. Acta Oncol. 1996;35(1):95-100. [PubMed]
-
25.
Bargagna-Mohan P, Hamza A, Kim YE, Khuan Abby Ho Y, Mor-Vaknin N,
Wendschlag N, et al. The tumor inhibitor and antiangiogenic agent
withaferin A targets the intermediate filament protein vimentin. Chem Biol. 2007;14(6):623-34. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
26.
Choi
BY, Kim BW. Withaferin-A Inhibits Colon Cancer Cell Growth by Blocking
STAT3 Transcriptional Activity. J Cancer Prev. 2015;20(3):185-92. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
27.
Martorana F, Guidotti G, Brambilla L, Rossi D. Withaferin A Inhibits
Nuclear Factor-kappaB-Dependent Pro-Inflammatory and Stress Response
Pathways in the Astrocytes. Neural Plast. 2015;2015:381964. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
28.
Lee
DH, Lim IH, Sung EG, Kim JY, Song IH, Park YK, et al. Withaferin A
inhibits matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity by suppressing the Akt
signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. 2013;30(2):933-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
29.
Munagala R, Kausar H, Munjal C, Gupta RC. Withaferin A induces
p53-dependent apoptosis by repression of HPV oncogenes and upregulation
of tumor suppressor proteins in human cervical cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32(11):1697-705. [DOI] [PubMed]